Adverse Event Reporting for Medications and Vaccines Before and During the COVID-19 Pandemic: An Observational and Retrospective Study

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30968/jhphs.2025.162.1260

Abstract

Objective: Compare the profile of suspected adverse events (AE) reports associated with medicines and vaccines before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. Method: An observational, retrospective study was conducted using data extracted from the VigiMed database. Spreadsheets were reviewed and processed, starting with the exclusion of the lines that had incomplete and uninterpretable data on the following variations related to the patient, related to the AE, related to the medication/vaccine and related to the notifier. Following database extract, reports were categorized into two groups: Group 1 (G1), before the pandemic; and Group 2 (G2), during the pandemic. Categorical variables were compared using absolute and relative frequency. Results: There was no difference between the notification profiles in the two groups about the sex and age of the individuals affected by AE related to medicines and vaccines. The notifiers in G1 were predominantly pharmacists (77.5%) while in G2, it was the consumers (55.9%). With respect to the products that were the target of the notifications, in G1 the most prevalent classes were analgesics, antibiotics and antineoplastics. In G2, there were vaccines against COVID-19 and immunosuppressants. About reports of suspected fatal AE related to medicines and vaccines, the most prevalent products in G1 were antimicrobials and antiepileptics, while G2 included antineoplastics, COVID-19 vaccines and immunosuppressants. Conclusion: The comparative of AE to drugs and vaccines notifications revealed that the COVID-19 pandemic contributed to a change in the profile of the notifiers, as well as in the type of product targeted by the notifications most frequently reported. These findings highlight the landscape of pharmacovigilance during public health emergencies.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Alhawassi TM, Krass I, Bajorek BV, et al. A systematic review of the prevalence and risk factors for adverse drug reactions in the elderly in the acute care setting. Clin Interv Aging. 2014;9:2079-2086. doi:10.2147/CIA.S71178

Anacleto TA, Perini E, Rosa MB, et al. Medication errors and drug-dispensing systems in a hospital pharmacy. Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2005;60(4):325-332. doi:10.1590/s1807-59322005000400011

Coleman JJ, Pontefract SK. Adverse drug reactions. Clin Med (Lond). 2016;16(5):481-485. doi:10.7861/clinmedicine.16-5-481

Zanetti ACB, Dias BM, Bernardes A, et al. Incidence and preventability of adverse events in adult patients admitted to a Brazilian teaching hospital. PLoS One. 2021;16(4):e0249531. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0249531

Bos JM, Kalkman GA, Groenewoud H, et al. Prediction of clinically relevant adverse drug events in surgical patients. PLoS One. 2018;13(8):e0201645. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0201645

Mota DM, Vigo Á, Kuchenbecker RS. Reações adversas a medicamentos no sistema de farmacovigilância do Brasil, 2008 a 2013: estudo descritivo. Cad Saude Publica. 2019;35(8):e00148818. doi:10.1590/0102-311X00148818

ISMP. Desafio Global de Segurança do Paciente – Medicação Sem Danos. Belo Horizonte: ISMP-Brasil; 2018.

Mota DM, Vigo Á, Kuchenbecker RS. Avaliação do desempenho do Sistema Nacional de Notificações para a Vigilância Sanitária: uma ferramenta do sistema de farmacovigilância no Brasil. Cien Saude Colet. 2020;25(5):1955-1966. doi:10.1590/1413-81232020255.19522018

Vogler M, Ricci CH, Araújo FK, et al. Electronic Reporting Systems in Pharmacovigilance: The Implementation of VigiFlow in Brazil. Frente. Farmacol. 2020;34(5):327–34. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2021.789872

OPAS/OMS. Segurança dos medicamentos: um guia para detectar e notificar reações adversas a medicamentos. Porque os profissionais de saúde precisam entrar em ação. Brasília: OMS;2005

Melo JRR, Duarte EC, Moraes MV, Fleck K, Arrais PSD. Automedicação e uso indiscriminado de medicamentos durante a pandemia da COVID-19. Cad Saude Publica. 2021;37(4):e00053221. doi:10.1590/0102-311X00053221

Ministério da Saúde. Noções em farmacovigilância. Available at: https://www.gov.br/anvisa/pt-br/acessoainformacao/dadosabertos/informacoes-analiticas/notificacoes-defarmacovigilancia. Accessed: January, 9, 2023.

Fialho ICTS, Monteiro DE, Soares RDS, et al. Reações adversas relacionadas aos inibidores de checkpoint: uma revisão integrativa. Rev Enferm UERJ. 2021; 29: e58363. doi: 10.12957/reuerj.2021.58363

Lin Y, Hu Z, Zhao Q, et al. Understanding COVID-19 vaccine demand and hesitancy: A nationwide online survey in China. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2020;14(12): e0008961. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0008961

Dias P, Ribeiro CF, Marques FB. Medidas de desproporcionalidade na deteção de sinal em farmacovigilância. Rev Port Farmacoter. 2014;6(1):31–5. doi: 10.25756/rpf.v6i1.36

Felix T, Jordan JB, Akers C, et al. Current state of biologic pharmacovigilance in the European Union: improvements are needed. Expert Opin Drug Saf. 2019;18(3):231-240. doi:10.1080/14740338.2019.1577818

Duarte M, Ferreira P, Soares M, et al. Community pharmacists’ attitudes towards adverse drug reaction reporting and their knowledge of the new pharmacovigilance legislation in the southern region of Portugal: a mixed methods study. Drugs Ther Perspect. 2015; 31 (9): 316–22. doi: 10.1007/s40267-015-0227-8

Dubrall D, Schmid M, Alešik E, Paeschke N, Stingl J, Sachs B. Frequent Adverse Drug Reactions, and Medication Groups under Suspicion. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2018;115(23):393-400. doi:10.3238/arztebl.2018.0393

Oliver SE, Gargano JW, Marin M, et al. The Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices’ Interim Recommendation for Use of Moderna COVID-19 Vaccine - United States, December 2020. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2021;69(5152):1653-1656. doi:10.15585/mmwr.mm695152e1

Montano D. Frequency and Associations of Adverse Reactions of COVID-19 Vaccines Reported to Pharmacovigilance Systems in the European Union and the United States. Front Public Health. 2022;9:756633. doi:10.3389/fpubh.2021.756633

Gargano JW, Wallace M, Hadler SC, et al. Use of mRNA COVID-19 Vaccine After Reports of Myocarditis Among Vaccine Recipients: Update from the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices - United States, June 2021. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2021;70(27):977-982. doi:10.15585/mmwr.mm7027e2

Tregoning JS, Flight KE, Higham SL, Wang Z, Pierce BF. Progress of the COVID-19 vaccine effort: viruses, vaccines and variants versus efficacy, effectiveness and escape. Nat Rev Immunol. 2021;21(10):626-636. doi:10.1038/s41577-021-00592-1

Iftikhar S, Sarwar MR, Saqib A, Sarfraz M. Causality and preventability assessment of adverse drug reactions and adverse drug events of antibiotics among hospitalized patients: A multicenter, cross-sectional study in Lahore, Pakistan. PLoS One. 2018;13(6):e0199456. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0199456

Montastruc JL, Lafaurie M, de Canecaude C, et al. Fatal adverse drug reactions: A worldwide perspective in the World Health Organization pharmacovigilance database. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2021;87(11):4334-4340. doi:10.1111/bcp.14851

Jo HG, Jeong K, Ryu JY, et al. Fatal Events Associated with Adverse Drug Reactions in the Korean National Pharmacovigilance Database. J Pers Med. 2021;12(1):5. doi:10.3390/jpm12010005

Downloads

Published

2025-06-28

How to Cite

1.
REIS RL, PAIVA ER, ALVES-CONCEIÇÃO V, SILVA DT. Adverse Event Reporting for Medications and Vaccines Before and During the COVID-19 Pandemic: An Observational and Retrospective Study. J Hosp Pharm Health Serv [Internet]. 2025Jun.28 [cited 2025Jun.30];16(2):e1260. Available from: https://jhphs.org/sbrafh/article/view/1260

Issue

Section

ORIGINAL ARTICLES

Most read articles by the same author(s)